
Corruption Stories
http://www.pppusa.org/Corruption/32.htm
TI rates military regime as more corrupt than political governments
NAB is
political tool of regime rather than for ending corruption
A PPP spokesperson has drawn attention to the report by Transparency
International which has claimed that the present military regime is perceived
as more corrupt than its democratic or civilian predecessors.
The corruption watchdog's 2006 report on
In a statement today spokesman of the Party said that despite rating as first
in corruption according to Transparency International, the regime was not
facing a single National Accountability Bureau case. This proved that the NAB
was for political and not for corruption purposes.
He said that corruption must be eradicated. Transparency International report
highlights the perception of corruption amongst the citizens. Instead of
politicizing corruption, the task of the Parliament and the people should be to
tackle corruption through setting high moral standards, freedom of information
and an impartial anti corruption watch-dog. The PPP pledged to do this when
voted into government.
The PPP spokesman said that Transparency International findings also rejected
the military regime's view that military dictatorships are honest. It may be
recalled that the military dictatorship supporters and the supporters of
democracy often trade charges as to which government is more corrupt. The
transparency international view, though not complimentary about political
governments, nonetheless comes out against the military regime as number one in
corruption.
He said that when military regimes of Ayub, Yahya, Zia and Musharaf were most corrupt, creating from twenty two
families to a high of sixty seven percent corruption,
it meant that the lower scores showed that the political governments had improved
on the situation although there is still a long way to go.
The spokesman said the issue of corruption should be separated from politics.
The history of